There has been a significant
increase in the incidence of chronic, relapsing, recurrent cases of superficial
dermatophytosis in India that are also often unresponsive to conventional drugs
and doses of recommended antifungal treatment.
Almost 15– 20% of the outpatient
department cases are those of chronic dermatophytosis.
Recurrences and relapses after
completion of full doses of treatment and resistance to major classes of
antifungal drugs have been observed.
The reasons for this phenomenon are
not clear but the proposed reasons are the abuse of irrational combination
creams containing potent corticosteroids, inadequate duration of treatment,
difficulties in eliminating predisposing factors and reinfection due to
inadequate source control.
TAKE HOME
MESSAGE:
Though there appears to be discordance
between in vivo and in vitro resistance,
demonstration of in vitro resistance of dermatophytes to
antifungals by antifungal susceptibility testing is essential as it may help in
appropriate management.
Resistance to griseofulvin, azoles and allylamines
have been reported in several studies during the current outbreak. However,
there appears to be some discordance between in vivo and in
vitro resistance.
Recent randomized controlled trial evidence
suggests that the four major oral antifungal agents, namely, itraconazole,
fluconazole, terbinafine and griseofulvin, have varying degrees of
disappointing effectiveness in chronic and chronic relapsing tinea corporis,
tinea cruris and tinea faciei patients in India.
With the
increasing number of cases of recalcitrant dermatophytoses, itraconazole has
undoubtedly stood out as the most favored molecule.
Among topical agents, luliconazole and sertaconazole are the most popular. Luliconazole is the currently preferred topical agent amongst all the available molecules in India.
Given the increasing resistance of dermatophytes to
the various groups of available antifungal agents, antifungal susceptibility
testing against dermatophytes is gaining importance. Minimum inhibitory concentration
of antifungal agents helps to predict the likelihood of efficacy of the
antifungal therapy.
The susceptibility profile of implicated
dermatophytes to the antifungal agents can guide the clinician to choose the
best antifungal agent with maximum efficacy, less toxicity and less expense.
Management of dermatophytosis is the biggest
challenge faced by dermatologists today. Herein, authors have summarized the
available therapeutic options, and have provided the rationale of using
different molecules in the appropriate dose and duration.
General measures
Indications of topical therapy include single
lesions, elderly patients with significant comorbidities, infants and
pregnancy.
An additional topical antifungal agent in a case where oral antifungal is administered concomitantly serves three purposes:
the local concentration of the topical antifungal
increases the chances of clearance;
the purported anti-inflammatory and antimicrobial
properties of the new topical antifungals help the cause; and
the patient satisfaction also increases.
Topical
antifungals
Oldest and nonspecific agents include
keratolytics-salicylic acid, lactic acid, Whitfield’s ointment and so on and
antiseptics like gentian violet, castellani’s paint, potassium permanganate.
These older topical agents have fallen out of favor for causing significant
irritation and color changes barring Whitfield’s ointment which is often used
in patients of moccasin tinea pedis.
Azoles
useful in superficial dermatophytosis
These molecules are the first line topical agents
these days, because of their promising effectiveness and low incidence of side
effects.
The available options in India from this group
include miconazole, bifonazole, clotrimazole, ketoconazole, oxiconazole,
sertaconazole, luliconazoleeberconazole, fenticonazole and fluconazole.
The
oft-used topical azole antifungals are discussed below:
There are regional differences across India in the
use of systemic antifungal agents, namely, itraconazole, terbinafine, griseofulvin,
ketoconazole and fluconazole.
However, itraconazole is the most preferred
antifungal in the current scenario due to increasing cases of terbinafine
failureIn a recently conducted randomized controlled trial in India among
chronic and chronic relapsing tinea corporis, tinea cruris and tinea faciei
patients, limited effectiveness of all four oral agents – fluconazole,
griseofulvin, itraconazole and terbinafine was the key finding.
In terms of cure rates and the number needed to
treat, among the four, itraconazole was found to be the most effective agent,
followed by fluconazole daily, then terbinafine and lastly griseofulvin.
Terbinafine
According to some clinicians, terbinafine at a dose
of 250 mg once daily for 4–6 weeks provides clinical cure. Presently, on
account of increasing evidence of resistance, terbinafine is not preferred,
although regional variability in the susceptibility and clinical responses
exist.
In a randomized study comparing oral itraconazole
versus oral terbinafine, mycological cure was seen in 91.8% after four weeks in
the itraconazole group as compared to 74.3% of patients in the terbinafine
group. Authors concluded that itraconazole and terbinafine were effective and
safe.
A divided dose of 250 mg twice daily is preferred
over 500 mg once daily since single dose defies the basic principles of
pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of the drug.
Itraconazole
With the increasing number of cases of recalcitrant
dermatophytoses, itraconazole has undoubtedly stood out as the most favored
molecule.
Itraconazole at a dose of 100 mg twice daily for a
minimum duration of 2–4 weeks in naïve cases, and four weeks in recalcitrant
cases was recommended in a consensus statement.
Fluconazole
Though not a preferred antifungal in the current
scenario according to recent evidence, fluconazole has certain advantages like
good oral absorption and lower cost.
Griseofulvin
Recommended dosage of griseofulvin is 1 g per day
for a period of four weeks according to western text books. Hot and humid
climate that is prevalent in India may necessitate an increase in the duration
more than the above mentioned four weeks duration.
Resistance to different antifungal
agents
Griseofulvin resistance
Antifungal resistance to
griseofulvin was first reported by Michaelides et al. in 1960 in
patients with Trichophyton rubrum and Trichophyton
tonsurans infection. A study from north India also reported tinea
capitis patients not responding to the systemic antifungal agent, griseofulvin. Increasing
reports of treatment failures with griseofulvin led to a shift in the treatment
of choice towards azoles and allylamines, but still, some recommend it for
the treatment of tinea capitis. Increased in vitro resistance
to griseofulvin has been reported from across the world.
Azole resistance
Though clinical trials have shown
that fluconazole is effective for the treatment of dermatophytosis, high
minimum inhibitory concentrations demonstrated by in vitro studies,
especially from recent studies from India criticizes its utility as the
preferred agent and it needs clinical trials to confirm its effectiveness.
Itraconazole is considered as one of the most effective azoles for the
treatment of dermatophytosis. In vitro data also indicates
that resistance to itraconazole is a rare phenomenon. In vitro antifungal
susceptibility results showed that itraconazole was the most effective oral
azole agent effective against dermatophytes isolated from north India. Most of
the studies on in vitro susceptibility testing on topical
azoles such as luliconazole, sertaconazole, efinaconazole and lanoconazole have
shown that all have very potent in vitro activity with low
minimum inhibitory concentrations
Allylamine resistance
Primary resistance to terbinafine
in Trichophyton rubrum that resulted in treatment failure was
first reported by Mukherjee et al., in 2003. In 2018,
high terbinafine resistance was reported in 15 (17%) Trichophyton
interdigitale (which can be considered to be the currently
defined Trichophyton mentagrophytes VIII) and five (14.3%)
of Trichophyton rubrum isolates. In addition to Trichophyton
rubrum, a mutation in the squalene epoxidase gene conferring resistance
in Trichophyton tonsurans and Epidermophyton floccosum were
also reported.
Comments
You must login to write comment