GERD is associated with substantial reductions in subjective well-being, lower work productivity, and increased healthcare use. The GERD in the Asia Pacific Survey (GAPS) found that GERD had a negative impact on well-being for 94% of respondents in terms of stress (68% of respondents), restrictions to daily activities (50%), and reduced work productivity (65%).
Nocturnal symptoms were a particular concern for this group, with 57% of respondents experiencing night-time symptoms. Nocturnal symptoms have been shown to severely impact subjective well-being and daytime functioning in several studies, and have been noted in up to 90% of patients with GERD.
The mainstay of treatment for GERD is proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy, which is superior to histamine-2 receptor antagonists and antacids.
There are several PPIs available, although many Asian patients with GERD continue to experience symptoms despite treatment with PPIs, suggesting an unmet need in the current treatment of GERD.
PPIs are the most effective therapy for patients with GERD. The factors involved in successful treatment include degree of acid suppression, duration of suppression over the 24-hour period, and duration of treatment.
Clinical Limitations of Conventional Proton Pump Inhibitors
While PPIs are widely regarded as the “gold-standard” of GERD treatment, there are a number of clinical limitations to currently available PPIs.
PPIs are associated with limited ability to fully relieve the discomfort of GERD, particularly at night.
The GERD in the Asia Pacific Survey (GAPS) found that only 23% of respondents felt that their pain was completely controlled with PPIs and 94% continued to experience breakthrough symptoms
In particular, 45% of respondents found that treatment for nocturnal pain was unsatisfactory.
The active ingredient in a PPI must be present in high concentrations when the proton pumps are stimulated before and during a meal.
As PPIs are acid labile, they need protection from degradation in the stomach by enteric coating or buffering.
PPIs are rapidly absorbed and subsequently eliminated, leading to a short plasma half-life and ultimately restricting their administration to before meals to achieve their full effect. As pre-meal dosing is inconvenient, this may lead to poor adherence.
The effects of PPIs tend to diminish during the 24-hour period enabling resumption of gastric acid secretion.
Adverse Interactions with Antiplatelet Therapy
Although PPIs are generally regarded as safe drugs, with any adverse effects being mostly mild and self-limiting, recent concerns have been raised about a possible interaction between some PPIs and clopidogrel.
A higher clopidogrel–PPI interaction has been observed in patients treated with omeprazole than in those treated with pantoprazole, esomeprazole, or rabeprazole.
Dexlansoprazole, lansoprazole, and pantoprazole have less effect on the antiplatelet activity of clopidogrel than do omeprazole or esomeprazole.
Why Dexlansoprazole is superior than other PPI?
Dual Delayed Release Formulation
Dexlansoprazole is a novel formulation that employs a dual delayed release technology designed to prolong the concentration–time profile and provide an extended duration of acid suppression.
The dual delayed release technology uses 2 types of enteric-coated granules with different pH-dependent dissolution profiles to provide an initial drug release in the proximal small intestine, at a pH of approximately 5.5, followed several hours later by another drug release at more distal regions of the small intestine, at a pH of ≥ 6.75.
Dexlansoprazole is the first PPI with a dual delayed release formulation designed to provide 2 separate releases of medication.
The FDA approved dexlansoprazole for the treatment of heartburn associated with symptomatic non-erosive GERD, healing of erosive esophagitis (EE) and maintenance of healed EE at doses of 30 mg and 60 mg once daily.
Pharmacokinetics
The plasma concentration–time profile for dexlansoprazole at steady state is characterized by two distinct peaks and prolonged drug exposure during the 24-hour dosing interval. The first peak occurred approximately 1–2 hours after dosing and the second occurred approximately 4–5 hours after dosing (time to maximum concentration was achieved at 5.0–5.4 hours), providing extended drug exposure.
Many patients with GERD take a PPI twice daily to control symptoms, either prescribed by their physician or as self-treatment.
However, because of the dual delayed release formulation of dexlansoprazole, once-daily dexlansoprazole could be beneficial as step-down therapy for patients who have symptom control with twice daily PPIs.
Study found 88% of patients taking a PPI twice daily to control heartburn were able to successfully step down to dexlansoprazole 30 mg once daily.
The preferred time of day for dosing of most PPIs is in the morning (in the fasting state). However, this is not always convenient for all patients. Owing to the dual delayed release formulation, dexlansoprazole can be taken flexibly, without regard to food or time of day.
These authors also studied the effect of administering dexlansoprazole at 4 different times of day: before breakfast, lunch, dinner, or evening snack. There were no clinically meaningful delays to the absorption of dexlansoprazole when dexlansoprazole was administered before lunch, dinner, or an evening snack compared with administration before breakfast, and there were no apparent differences in systemic exposure, with all regimens being pharmacokinetically bioequivalent.
Dexlansoprazole, the drug maintains a consistent blood level above 125 ng/mL; longer than all the conventional PPIs. Any PPI that can maintain a higher plasma level for longer could theoretically achieve longer acid suppression and this is evident in the dexlansoprazole clinical studies.
Therefore, there is no need for clinicians to recommend that dexlansoprazole be taken 30 minutes before a meal.
Comments
You must login to write comment