Effect of Itraconazole Dosing Regimens on Cure Rates, Treatment Duration, Safety, and Relapse Rates in Tinea Corporis/Cruris

JAMA Dermatology: Published on September 28, 2022

With worldwide emergence of recalcitrant and resistant dermatophytosis, itraconazole is increasingly being used as the first-line drug for treatment of tinea corporis/cruris (TCC).

Apparent inadequacy with low doses has led to empirical use of higher doses and antifungal combinations.

This study aim is to compare cure rates, treatment durations, safety profiles, and relapse rates of itraconazole 100, 200, and 400 mg/d for the treatment of TCC.

TAKE-HOME MESSAGE

Question:  What are the efficacy, treatment durations, safety, and relapse rates of 100, 200, and 400 mg/d of itraconazole in treatment of tinea corporis/cruris?

Findings:  In this randomized clinical trial of 149 adult patients, there was high overall drug efficacy but need for prolonged treatment.

There was no statistically significant difference observed in efficacy or treatment durations between the 100- and 200-mg groups, while treatment with the 400-mg dose led to significantly higher cure rates and shorter treatment durations, though relapse rates were similar across groups.

Meaning:  Itraconazole is highly efficacious at all 3 doses but requires prolonged treatment, and a substantial number of patients relapsed after successful treatment.

Clinicians should be aware of emerging terbinafine-resistant dermatophytes and could consider longer duration itraconazole courses for the treatment of patients with TCC, although counseling the patients regarding a potentially high risk of relapse would be important.


Doctors Liked to Read More

IMPORTANCE

With worldwide emergence of recalcitrant and resistant dermatophytosis, itraconazole is increasingly being used as the first-line drug for treatment of tinea corporis/cruris (TCC). Apparent inadequacy with low doses has led to empirical use of higher doses and antifungal combinations.

OBJECTIVE

To compare cure rates, treatment durations, safety profiles, and relapse rates of itraconazole 100, 200, and 400 mg/d for the treatment of TCC.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This double-blind randomized clinical trial included adult patients with treatment-naive TCC involving at least 5% body surface area. Patients were recruited from the dermatology outpatient department of a tertiary care hospital in New Delhi, India between March 1, 2020, and August 31, 2021.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were randomized to 1 of the 3 treatment groups. Biweekly blinded assessments were performed until cure or treatment failure. Post-treatment follow-up of at least 8 weeks was conducted to detect relapses.

MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURES

Cure rates, treatment durations, safety profiles, and relapse rates were assessed. Secondary outcomes included comparison of rapidity of clinical response and cost-effectiveness between groups.

RESULTS

Of the 149 patients assessed, the mean (SD) age was 34.3 (12.2) years, 69 patients (46.4%) were women, and 80 patients (53.6%) were men. The difference in cure rate between the 100- and 200-mg groups was statistically non-significant, while the difference between the 100- and 400-mg groups and between the 200- and 400-mg groups was statistically significant. Mean (SD) treatment durations were statistically significantly different between the 100- and 400-mg groups (7.7 [4.7] weeks vs 5.2 [2.6] weeks) and between the 200- and 400-mg groups (7.2 [3.8] weeks vs 5.2 [2.6] weeks), but the difference between the 100- and 200-mg groups was not statistically significant. A total of 55 patients (47.4%) relapsed after treatment. Relapse rates were comparable across groups. No patient discontinued treatment due to adverse effects. Treatment with the 200-mg dose incurred a 63% higher cost and 400 mg a 120% higher cost over 100 mg in achieving cure.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this randomized clinical trial, high overall efficacy was observed among the 3 itraconazole doses for treatment of TCC, but with prolonged treatment durations and considerable relapse rates. Treatment with the 200- and 100-mg doses did not differ significantly in efficacy or treatment durations, while 400 mg scored over the other 2 on these outcomes. Considerable additional cost is incurred in achieving cure with the 200- and 400-mg doses.

Read In Details


https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamadermatology/article-abstract/2795924
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36103158/

This is for informational purposes only. You should consult your clinical textbook for advising your patients.