TAKE-HOME MESSAGE
Despite the
frequency of tonsillectomy in decades past, there are only two major reasons
for a child to undergo this procedure:
The presence of
obstructive sleep apnea or recurrent tonsillitis.
The benefit in the
former case is obvious. However, does it really decrease the incidence of
infections? Researchers believe it does, but what does the evidence
show?
This question is
made all the more complicated by the sometimes-loose diagnosis of “tonsillitis”
based on nothing more than “red throat” observations, without laboratory
confirmation.
This systematic
review focuses exclusively on children with 3 or more documented infections
over the previous 3 years, looking at 7 studies to focus on outcome differences
between tonsillectomy versus watchful waiting.
Of note, “watchful waiting” could also include treatment with antibiotics or intranasal steroids.
Results:
The results were interesting. Both groups had a decrease in sore throat incidence. However, the tonsillectomy group had a greater decrease in the number of days with sore throat, visits to healthcare providers, diagnosed group A streptococcal infections, and school absences. However, the quality-of-life scores were not markedly different between the two groups.
Recommendations:
So, based on this,
should busy clinicians recommend tonsillectomy to their patients?
Not so fast—it
turned out that the benefits listed above did not persist longer than a year
after surgery.
So, should we not
bother, given the risks of anesthesia and surgical complications?
It’s unclear at
this time—there just isn’t strong evidence showing longer-term benefits.
Comments
You must login to write comment