Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism Journal:
PubMed
TAKE HOME MESSAGE:
The study aims to investigate the
effect of sequential treatment escalation with empagliflozin and linagliptin on
laboratory markers of α- and β-cell function in people with type 2 diabetes
mellitus (T2DM) insufficiently controlled on metformin monotherapy.
The researchers found that
empagliflozin reduced fasting and postprandial plasma glucose levels,
correlating with a significant reduction in postprandial insulin levels and an
improvement in the conversion rate of proinsulin.
The addition of linagliptin further
improved postprandial glucose levels, most likely due to a marked reduction in
postprandial glucagon concentrations. The insulin response to an intravenous
glucose load improved in both treatment periods.
After metformin failure, sequential treatment escalation with empagliflozin and linagliptin is an attractive treatment option because of the additive effects on postprandial glucose control, probably mediated by complementary effects on α- and β-cell function.
Aims: To
investigate the effect of sequential treatment escalation with empagliflozin
and linagliptin on laboratory markers of α- and β-cell function in people with
type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) insufficiently controlled on metformin
monotherapy.
Research design and methods: A total of
44 people with T2DM received 25 mg empagliflozin for a duration of 1 month in
an open-label fashion (treatment period 1 [TP1]). Thereafter, they were
randomized to a double-blind add-on therapy with linagliptin 5 mg or placebo
(treatment period 2 [TP2]) for 1 additional month. α- and β-cell function was
assessed using a standardized liquid meal test and an intravenous (i.v.)
glucose challenge. Efficacy measures comprised the areas under the curve for
glucose, insulin, proinsulin and glucagon after the liquid meal test and the
assessment of fast and late-phase insulin release after an i.v. glucose load
with a subsequent hyperglycaemic clamp.
Results: Empagliflozin
reduced fasting and postprandial plasma glucose levels, associated with a
significant reduction in postprandial insulin levels and an improvement in the
conversion rate of proinsulin (TP1). The addition of linagliptin during TP2
further improved postprandial glucose levels, probably as a result of a marked
reduction in postprandial glucagon concentrations (TP2). The insulin response
to an i.v. glucose load increased during treatment with empagliflozin (TP1),
and further improved after the addition of linagliptin (TP2).
Conclusion: After
metformin failure, sequential treatment escalation with empagliflozin and
linagliptin is an attractive treatment option because of the additive effects
on postprandial glucose control, probably mediated by complementary effects on
α- and β-cell function.
Comments
You must login to write comment