European Heart Journal: September, 2022
Cardiovascular (CV) disease (CVD) is the leading cause of
morbidity and mortality worldwide, despite continuous improvement of medical
treatment, diagnosis, and risk factor control. It has been clearly
demonstrated that statin therapy confers significant mortality and morbidity
benefits in both the primary and secondary prevention of CVD.
Statin intolerance and the discontinuation of statin therapy
is an ongoing clinical problem worldwide. Statin intolerance is associated
with suboptimal lipid-lowering therapy and a high risk of first and recurrent
CVD events.
Statin Intolerance (SI) refers to an inability to tolerate ≥2 statins at any dose or an inability to tolerate increasing doses. The symptoms must not be attributable to drug–drug interactions or conditions known to increase SI.
Symptomatic criteria include intolerable muscle symptoms
[pain, weakness, or cramps with or without creatine kinase (CK) changes] or
severe myopathy, and they must appear in the first 12 weeks after initiating
treatment or following an increase in dose.
Numerous studies, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses have
demonstrated an association between statin non-adherence and discontinuation
and the risk of CVD and mortality.
The present meta-analysis aimed to estimate the overall
prevalence of SI, its prevalence according to various diagnostic criteria, in
different disease settings, and to identify possible risk factors for SI.
TAKE-HOME MESSAGE
The most common cause of discontinuation of statin therapy is
statin-associated muscle symptoms (SAMS). Other possible statin-related
adverse effects include neurocognitive disorders, hepatotoxicity, haemorrhagic
stroke, and renal toxicity.
This meta-analysis estimated overall statin intolerance (SI)
prevalence and identified factors that might increase the risk of SI. Combining
data from 176 studies with >4 million patients, the prevalence of SI was
9.1%.
Additionally, SI prevalence was lower in randomized
controlled trials than in cohort studies. Age, female gender, high statin dose,
Asian and Black race, obesity, diabetes mellitus, alcohol use, hypothyroidism,
and chronic liver and renal failure were identified as risk factors for SI, as
were increased statin doses and the concomitant administration of
antiarrhythmic agents.
Statins are the main treatment to reduce LDL-C levels and to
reduce ASCVD risk. Identifying true SI is important in order to avoid
unnecessary statin discontinuation, especially in high ASCVD–risk patients.
Although the prevalence of SI is relatively low,
identification of risk factors and their management in high ASCVD–risk patients
is important to encourage statin adherence and therefore to reduce
cardiovascular risk.
Conclusion
Based on the data from >4 million patients, authors
demonstrated that the overall prevalence of Statin intolerance (SI) is
relatively low.
These results support the concept that the prevalence of
complete SI is often overestimated and highlights the need for a very careful
assessment of patients with SI, to decrease the risk of unnecessary statin
discontinuation, and suboptimal lipid-lowering therapy.
Clinicians should use these results to encourage adherence to
statin therapy in their patients.
It is also necessary to advise patients on what to do if they have muscle complaints, including temporary discontinuation, statin re-challenge, down-titration of dose or switching to another statin, or evaluating other therapeutic alternatives with proven effectiveness in reducing CV risk, like ezetimibe or PCSK9 inhibitors.
Aims: Statin intolerance (SI) represents a significant public
health problem for which precise estimates of prevalence are needed. Statin
intolerance remains an important clinical challenge, and it is associated with
an increased risk of cardiovascular events. This meta-analysis estimates the
overall prevalence of SI, the prevalence according to different diagnostic
criteria and in different disease settings, and identifies possible risk
factors/conditions that might increase the risk of SI.
Methods and results: We searched several databases up to 31 May 2021, for
studies that reported the prevalence of SI. The primary endpoint was overall
prevalence and prevalence according to a range of diagnostic criteria [National
Lipid Association (NLA), International Lipid Expert Panel (ILEP), and European
Atherosclerosis Society (EAS)] and in different disease settings. The secondary
endpoint was to identify possible risk factors for SI. A random-effects model
was applied to estimate the overall pooled prevalence. A total of 176 studies
[112 randomized controlled trials (RCTs); 64 cohort studies] with 4 143 517
patients were ultimately included in the analysis. The overall prevalence of SI
was 9.1%. The prevalence was similar when defined using NLA, ILEP, and EAS
criteria [7.0% (6.0-8.0%), 6.7% (5.0-8.0%), 5.9% (4.0-7.0%), respectively]. The
prevalence of SI in RCTs was significantly lower compared with cohort studies
[4.9% (4.0-6.0%) vs. 17% (14-19%)]. The prevalence of SI in studies including
both primary and secondary prevention patients was much higher than when
primary or secondary prevention patients were analysed separately [18%
(14-21%), 8.2% (6.0-10%), 9.1% (6.0-11%), respectively]. Statin lipid
solubility did not affect the prevalence of SI [4.0% (2.0-5.0%) vs. 5.0%
(4.0-6.0%)]. Age, female gender, Asian and Black race, obesity, diabetes
mellitus, hypothyroidism, chronic liver, and renal failure were significantly
associated with SI in the meta-regression model. Antiarrhythmic agents, calcium
channel blockers, alcohol use, and increased statin dose were also associated with
a higher risk of SI.
Conclusion: Based on the present analysis of >4 million patients, the
prevalence of SI is low when diagnosed according to international definitions.
These results support the concept that the prevalence of complete SI might
often be overestimated and highlight the need for the careful assessment of
patients with potential symptoms related to SI.
Comments
You must login to write comment