JAMA Internal Medicine: Published on May, 2023
Diabetic kidney disease is the leading cause of chronic
kidney disease and end-stage kidney failure in the vast majority of the
world.
TAKE-HOME MESSAGE
This randomized clinical trial evaluated the use of
glucose-lowering medications on kidney outcomes.
A total of 5047 patients with type 2 diabetes without kidney
disease at baseline and treated with metformin were assigned to treatment with
a sulfonylurea, a DPP-4 inhibitor, a GLP-1 receptor agonist, or basal insulin.
In this randomized clinical trial, among people with T2D and
predominantly free of kidney disease at baseline, no significant differences in
kidney outcomes were observed during 5 years of follow-up when a dipeptidyl
peptidase 4 inhibitor, sulfonylurea, glucagonlike peptide 1 receptor agonist,
or basal insulin was added to metformin for glycemic control.
CONCLUSION
At the end of this trial, there were no significant
differences in the rates of decreased eGFR, progression of albuminuria,
dialysis, kidney transplantation, or death during the 5-year follow-up.
This is important in clinical practice as we tend to tailor
therapy toward patient comorbidities. In the absence of kidney disease
specifically, treatment should be tailored toward glycemic goals, which can be
achieved with different agents.
EXPERTS COMMENT:
We have learned through the observations of numerous clinical
trials over the past several decades that improving glycemic and blood pressure
control, particularly with the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors
(ACEI) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB), results in slower progression of
albuminuria and reduced incidence of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD).
More recently, the results of three clinical trials
demonstrated that sodium glucose co-transporter inhibitors are capable of
slowing progression of kidney disease despite intercurrent use of
renin–angiotensin system blocking drugs, and independent of glucose control.
Unfortunately, the study was far too brief, despite 5 years
of follow-up, to examine hard renal endpoints like ESKD. The majority of
patients were at low risk, with excellent kidney function, well-controlled
blood pressure, and little or no albuminuria. It could take decades to
demonstrate clinical outcome differences between different treatment regimens
in patients like these.
It is likely that SGLT2 inhibitors would prove to be superior
to other agents in the prevention of diabetic kidney disease if future
comparative clinical trials are conducted. There is data suggesting that SGLT2
inhibitors slow albuminuria progression and loss of GFR in patients with type 2
diabetes and low-grade albuminuria.
Expert opinion is that SGLT2 inhibitors remain a preferred
therapeutic consideration in conjunction with metformin in patients with type 2
diabetes at-risk for developing kidney complications, or with established
kidney disease.
Comments
You must login to write comment