Association between Achieved LDL-C Levels and Long-Term Cardiovascular and Safety Outcomes

AHA Journal: Circulation: Published on February, 2023

Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) level is a well-established risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. However, the optimal achieved LDL-C level with regard to efficacy and safety in the long term remains unknown.

TAKE-HOME MESSAGE

This study assessed the relationship between achieved LDL-C levels and the incidence of subsequent cardiovascular and safety outcomes among 6559 patients over 7 years of follow-up.

The authors found that lower achieved LDL-C levels, down to <20 mg/dL, were associated with lower risks of the primary efficacy endpoint (composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and hospital admission for unstable angina or coronary revascularization) and the secondary efficacy endpoint (composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, and stroke), with no significant safety concerns.

These findings suggest that long-term achievement of lower LDL-C levels is safe and associated with a lower risk of adverse cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.

Conclusions: 

In patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, long-term achievement of lower LDL-C levels, down to <20 mg/dL (<0.5 mmol/L), was associated with a lower risk of cardiovascular outcomes with no significant safety concerns.


Doctors Liked to Read More

Background: Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) level is a well-established risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. However, the optimal achieved LDL-C level with regard to efficacy and safety in the long term remains unknown.

Methods: In FOURIER (Further Cardiovascular Outcomes Research With PCSK9 Inhibition in Subjects With Elevated Risk), 27 564 patients with stable atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease were randomized to evolocumab versus placebo, with a median follow-up of 2.2 years. In the open-label extension (FOURIER-OLE), 6635 of these patients were transitioned to open-label evolocumab regardless of initial treatment allocation in the parent trial and were followed up with for an additional median of 5 years. In this prespecified analysis, we examined the relationship between achieved LDL-C levels (an average of the first 2 LDL-C levels measured) in FOURIER-OLE (available in 6559 patients) and the incidence of subsequent cardiovascular and safety outcomes. We also performed sensitivity analyses evaluating cardiovascular and safety outcomes in the entire FOURIER and FOURIER-OLE patient population. Multivariable modeling was used to adjust for baseline factors associated with achieved LDL-C levels.

Results: In FOURIER-OLE, 1604 (24%), 2627 (40%), 1031 (16%), 486 (7%), and 811 (12%) patients achieved LDL-C levels of <20, 20 to <40, 40 to <55, 55 to <70, and ≥70 mg/dL, respectively. There was a monotonic relationship between lower achieved LDL-C levels-down to very low levels <20 mg/dL-and a lower risk of the trial's primary efficacy end point (composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or hospital admission for unstable angina or coronary revascularization) and the key secondary efficacy end point (composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke) that persisted after multivariable adjustment. No statistically significant associations existed in the primary analyses between lower achieved LDL-C levels and increased risk of the safety outcomes (serious adverse events, new or recurrent cancer, cataract-related adverse events, hemorrhagic stroke, new-onset diabetes, neurocognitive adverse events, muscle-related events, or noncardiovascular death). Similar findings were noted in the entire FOURIER and FOURIER-OLE cohort up to a maximum follow-up of 8.6 years.

Conclusions: In patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, long-term achievement of lower LDL-C levels, down to <20 mg/dL (<0.5 mmol/L), was associated with a lower risk of cardiovascular outcomes with no significant safety concerns.

Read In Details


https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36779348/
https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.122.063399

This is for informational purposes only. You should consult your clinical textbook for advising your patients.