AHA Journal: Circulation: Published on February,
2023
Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol
(LDL-C) level is a well-established risk factor for atherosclerotic
cardiovascular disease. However, the optimal achieved LDL-C level with regard
to efficacy and safety in the long term remains unknown.
TAKE-HOME MESSAGE
This study assessed the
relationship between achieved LDL-C levels and the incidence of subsequent
cardiovascular and safety outcomes among 6559 patients over 7 years of
follow-up.
The authors found that lower
achieved LDL-C levels, down to <20 mg/dL, were associated with lower risks
of the primary efficacy endpoint (composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial
infarction, stroke, and hospital admission for unstable angina or coronary
revascularization) and the secondary efficacy endpoint (composite of
cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, and stroke), with no significant
safety concerns.
These findings suggest that
long-term achievement of lower LDL-C levels is safe and associated with a lower
risk of adverse cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality in patients with
atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.
Conclusions:
In patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, long-term achievement of lower LDL-C levels, down to <20 mg/dL (<0.5 mmol/L), was associated with a lower risk of cardiovascular outcomes with no significant safety concerns.
Background: Low-density
lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) level is a well-established risk factor for
atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. However, the optimal achieved LDL-C
level with regard to efficacy and safety in the long term remains unknown.
Methods: In FOURIER
(Further Cardiovascular Outcomes Research With PCSK9 Inhibition in Subjects
With Elevated Risk), 27 564 patients with stable atherosclerotic cardiovascular
disease were randomized to evolocumab versus placebo, with a median follow-up
of 2.2 years. In the open-label extension (FOURIER-OLE), 6635 of these patients
were transitioned to open-label evolocumab regardless of initial treatment
allocation in the parent trial and were followed up with for an additional
median of 5 years. In this prespecified analysis, we examined the relationship
between achieved LDL-C levels (an average of the first 2 LDL-C levels measured)
in FOURIER-OLE (available in 6559 patients) and the incidence of subsequent
cardiovascular and safety outcomes. We also performed sensitivity analyses
evaluating cardiovascular and safety outcomes in the entire FOURIER and
FOURIER-OLE patient population. Multivariable modeling was used to adjust for
baseline factors associated with achieved LDL-C levels.
Results: In
FOURIER-OLE, 1604 (24%), 2627 (40%), 1031 (16%), 486 (7%), and 811 (12%)
patients achieved LDL-C levels of <20, 20 to <40, 40 to <55, 55 to
<70, and ≥70 mg/dL, respectively. There was a monotonic relationship between
lower achieved LDL-C levels-down to very low levels <20 mg/dL-and a lower
risk of the trial's primary efficacy end point (composite of cardiovascular
death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or hospital admission for unstable angina
or coronary revascularization) and the key secondary efficacy end point
(composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke) that
persisted after multivariable adjustment. No statistically significant
associations existed in the primary analyses between lower achieved LDL-C
levels and increased risk of the safety outcomes (serious adverse events, new
or recurrent cancer, cataract-related adverse events, hemorrhagic stroke,
new-onset diabetes, neurocognitive adverse events, muscle-related events, or
noncardiovascular death). Similar findings were noted in the entire FOURIER and
FOURIER-OLE cohort up to a maximum follow-up of 8.6 years.
Conclusions: In patients
with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, long-term achievement of lower
LDL-C levels, down to <20 mg/dL (<0.5 mmol/L), was associated with a
lower risk of cardiovascular outcomes with no significant safety concerns.
Comments
You must login to write comment